← Back to Archive View Original Source ↗

FBI's Biden Laptop Coverup: A Crisis of Trust

Published on 1 April 2025 | Deep link: ://iq2qq.com{postSlug || ''}

On April 1, 2025, Catherine Herridge and Public revealed on X that the FBI imposed a “gag order” on Hunter Biden’s laptop after an analyst confirmed its authenticity to Twitter on October 14, 2020—the day the New York Post broke the story [Herridge, 2025]. Internal FBI chats show officials silencing discussion of the “Biden matter” weeks before the 2020 election, despite knowing the laptop was real since 2019. This coverup, paired with the laptop’s shocking contents, exposes the FBI’s bias and failure to uphold justice, eroding public trust in the agency.

https://twitter.com/BasedSavannah/status/1907126870258131215


FBI’s Suppression: Hiding the Truth

The FBI seized Hunter Biden’s laptop in December 2019 and confirmed its authenticity by November 2019, finding no tampering [New York Post, 2023]. Yet, when the New York Post published its story in October 2020, revealing emails suggesting Hunter leveraged his father’s position, the FBI suppressed the truth. An analyst confirmed the laptop’s authenticity to Twitter, but an FBI attorney imposed a “gag order,” with chats instructing, “do not discuss biden matter” [Herridge, 2025]. The FBI also ran a months-long campaign to “pre-bunk” the story, misleading social media companies into censoring it as potential Russian disinformation [JudiciaryGOP, 2025; Shellenberger, 2025]. This allowed a false narrative—fueled by 51 former intelligence officials—to take hold, while 30 million Americans voted without access to the story [MarioNawfal, 2025]. The FBI’s silence suggests political bias over transparency.


The Laptop’s Revelations: A Biden Family Scandal

Hunter’s laptop, left at a Delaware repair shop in 2019, reveals a web of misconduct:


FBI’s Inaction: Protecting the Bidens

Despite knowing the laptop’s authenticity, the FBI only acted in 2024, using it to convict Hunter on firearm charges while ignoring broader allegations [ABC 3340, 2024]. IRS whistleblower Gary Shapley testified that DOJ prosecutors blocked steps implicating Joe Biden before the 2020 election [New York Post, 2023]. Forensic experts noted the laptop data was mishandled, but this doesn’t excuse the FBI’s silence [Washington Post, 2025]. The FBI’s redactions of chat logs in 2024 further suggest a coverup [Herridge, 2025].


FBI Bias: A Double Standard

The FBI’s actions contrast with its aggressive pursuit of Trump-related probes, like the 2016 Russia investigation, despite finding no conspiracy [House Judiciary Committee]. Texts from FBI agent Peter Strzok calling Trump an “idiot” reveal internal bias, suggesting the FBI’s silence on the laptop favored Joe Biden [House Judiciary Committee]. Critics claim this “intentionally rigged the 2020 election” [ClayTravis, 2025].


Biden Family Racism: A Troubling Pattern

Hunter’s racist remarks—using the N-word, rejecting “yellow” women, and disparaging Jewish people—clash with Joe Biden’s anti-racism stance, like his 2021 speech against Asian-American attacks [Western Journal, 2025]. Joe’s own history, including calling integrated schools a “racial jungle” in 1977, suggests a family pattern of racial insensitivity [Politico, 2024].

Poll Response: Yes, the Biden family has a problem with racism, based on Hunter’s statements and Joe’s past remarks.


Fallout: A Tarnished FBI

The FBI’s coverup potentially influenced the 2020 election by limiting the story’s reach [Herridge, 2025]. Public outrage on X calls for the FBI’s reform, with its reputation damaged by bias and inaction. The task force behind the suppression was dismantled by Trump, Pam Bondi, and Kash Patel, but the damage to trust remains [MarioNawfal, 2025].


Conclusion: Demand Accountability

The FBI’s suppression of Hunter Biden’s laptop—revealing abuse, misconduct, racism, and potential crimes—shows a failure of justice. The agency must face investigation, release unredacted records, and pursue all allegations to restore trust.

Source: iq2qq/Grok

References